[j-nsp] Juniper MX and VZ FIOS question

Chris Evans chrisccnpspam2 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 6 09:48:06 EST 2015


Thanks..  Exactly the answer that I was looking.. Just needed to know the
feature/solution name so I can go research it.

Found this doc:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/solutions/information-products/pathway-pages/solutions/8010092-en.pdf

IPoE would be what it is.

Another Example:
http://rickmur.com/bras-on-juniper-mx/


On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

>
>
> On 6/Mar/15 00:34, Chris Evans wrote:
> > I'm a FIOS user and they use Juniper MX in many locations (along with E
> > series in older installs) and I'm curious of a typical configuration
> they'd
> > be using. WIth FIOS I just have a straight ethernet connection, no
> logging
> > in, no providing user information, etc..
> >
> > So since i'm not logging in would that still be a BRAS configuration?
> > Also they have a feature enabled that poisons ARP entries if you try to
> put
> > a box on the wire that has a different IP than what your DHCP lease is
> > given you. What feature would that be?
> >
> > Very curious how they'd do this. I've only worked with JUNOS boxes in the
> > enterprise so I don't have experience with features like this.
>
> Yes, it would still be a BNG solution, but using DHCP (in lieu of PPPoE).
>
> Authentication could be based on several things such as MAC address,
> VLAN ID, switch/OLT port, or a combination of them.
>
> The MX as a BNG supports DHCP subscriber management. I'm sure the ERX
> does too.
>
> Personally, I prefer DHCP to PPPoE.
>
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list