[j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

Luca Salvatore luca at digitalocean.com
Wed Mar 18 11:50:11 EDT 2015


Hi,

Yes VRRP is in use.  Running 13.2R5.10, single RE.
Running active-active

What config do you want to see?  I don't want to post the whole thing.






On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Syed Iftikhar Ahmed <iahmed at emw-me.com>
wrote:

> Is it active/ active or active/ standby setup. Config for 9200 is
> different than the One mentioned jn Kb, are you using vrrp as well?
> Please post your config, junos version.
>
> Do you have two RE in chassis or one?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 18, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Luca Salvatore <luca at digitalocean.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone seen an issue where the standby mc-lag peer does not age out MACs
> > that it has learned from the active peer?
> >
> > i'm seeing a huge difference in the mac address count on two ex9208
> mc-lag
> > peers.  By huge I mean about 75,000 difference.
> >
> > some basic testing shows that when a mac address is aged out of the
> active
> > peer, the standby one just keeps it forever.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Luca.
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
Luca Salvatore
Network Engineer
Cell: +1 (929) 214-7242
Desk: +1 (347) 305-4030


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list