[j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

Syed Iftikhar Ahmed iahmed at emw-me.com
Wed Mar 18 12:13:19 EDT 2015


Sh interface mc-ae id xx
Iccp link configuration.
Ping output between chassis using iccp ips
And any one mc-lag interface config from both chassis

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:50 PM, Luca Salvatore <luca at digitalocean.com<mailto:luca at digitalocean.com>> wrote:

Hi,

Yes VRRP is in use.  Running 13.2R5.10, single RE.
Running active-active

What config do you want to see?  I don't want to post the whole thing.






On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Syed Iftikhar Ahmed <iahmed at emw-me.com<mailto:iahmed at emw-me.com>> wrote:
Is it active/ active or active/ standby setup. Config for 9200 is different than the One mentioned jn Kb, are you using vrrp as well?
Please post your config, junos version.

Do you have two RE in chassis or one?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 18, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Luca Salvatore <luca at digitalocean.com<mailto:luca at digitalocean.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone seen an issue where the standby mc-lag peer does not age out MACs
> that it has learned from the active peer?
>
> i'm seeing a huge difference in the mac address count on two ex9208 mc-lag
> peers.  By huge I mean about 75,000 difference.
>
> some basic testing shows that when a mac address is aged out of the active
> peer, the standby one just keeps it forever.
>
> Thanks
> Luca.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



--
Luca Salvatore
Network Engineer
Cell: +1 (929) 214-7242
Desk: +1 (347) 305-4030


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list