[j-nsp] Juniper and Cisco - BGP MPLS L2VPN VPLS interoperability

[Alexander Arseniev]

Hello,
If You add an extra address family to the peering, the session is reset 
and this works as designed.
This is not specific to Juniper or Cisco or vendor XYZ, this is BGP 
protocol spec.
HTH
Thx
Alex

On 20/11/2015 18:07, Aaron wrote:
> Can anyone share any experiences with interoperating Cisco and Juniper BGP
> MPLS L2VPN's ?
>
>   
>
> Yesterday I fired up L2VPN configs in my ACX5048 and MX104 in my lab and
> brought up BGP L2VPN address family and got some bad results
>
>   
>
> It caused all of my Cisco ME3600's in my network to send BGP Notifications
> and drop their MP-BGP neighbor sessions to the Route Reflector core and
> purge all their vpnv4, vpnv6 and l2vpn topology tables !
>
>   
>
> Bad customer impact. lots of trouble.
>
>   
>
> "Rollback 1" on ACX and MX and all is well
>
>   
>
> Anyway have trouble in this area ?
>
>   
>
> Aaron
>
>   
>
> P.S. for a couple weeks those same ACX and MX were running just fine with my
> route reflector core (dual asr9k's) and running fine with BGP MPLS L3VPN's
> (layer 3) routing-instances. able to talk to the rest of the routing
> domains, etc.  all that seemed fine.  It was just this L2VPN stuff yesterday
> was bad.
>
>   
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp