[j-nsp] Cisco ASR 9001 vs Juniper MX104

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Nov 30 15:04:29 EST 2015



On 30/Nov/15 21:18, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote:

> Regarding CGNAT the MX104 can have MS-MIC that can do all of the
> PBA/NAPT/ALG/EIM.... features for near 10G

I've never been keen on adding more expensive hardware to existing
expensive hardware to do something that ought to be supported inline.

This is why the ASR1000 is a better option, IMHO.

Mark.



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list