[j-nsp] Cisco ASR 9001 vs Juniper MX104

Amos Rosenboim amos at oasis-tech.net
Mon Nov 30 15:56:28 EST 2015

I don't think ASR1K is comparable to MX.
The Juniper platform we position against ASR1K is the Juniper SRX.


Sent from my iPhone

On 30 Nov 2015, at 22:05, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu<mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu>> wrote:

On 30/Nov/15 21:18, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote:

Regarding CGNAT the MX104 can have MS-MIC that can do all of the
PBA/NAPT/ALG/EIM.... features for near 10G

I've never been keen on adding more expensive hardware to existing
expensive hardware to do something that ought to be supported inline.

This is why the ASR1000 is a better option, IMHO.


juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list