[j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

Adam Vitkovsky Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
Fri Oct 30 05:06:36 EDT 2015


> Saku Ytti [mailto:saku at ytti.fi]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 12:37 AM
> Exactly. So if it's smart device, like Trio, it can do smart thing with or without
> control-word (unsure if Trio does, and it does, since what versions), if it's
> stupid box, lack of control-word causes breakage.
> So I see no scenario when it's preferable to omit control-word.
Yes I agree that control word should definitely be enabled across the board, it’s necessary on Cisco anyways.


        Adam Vitkovsky
        IP Engineer

T:      0333 006 5936
E:      Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
W:      www.gamma.co.uk

This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster at gamma.co.uk

Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list