[j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

[Michael Hare]

I see that 14.1 [we're going there for E-VPN] also supports RFC 6391 and RFC 6790, so I probably need to take a closer look.  Anyone have experience with either in JunOS yet?  Mark, was it you that was on 14.2 for ingress CoS purposes?

Sorry if this has been discussed before on list

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos14.1/topics/reference/configuration-statement/flow-label-transmit-static-edit-protocols-l2circuit.html
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos14.1/topics/task/configuration/mpls-entopy-label-configuring.html

-Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of Michael Hare
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 7:45 AM
> To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu>; Adam Vitkovsky
> <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk>; Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle
> 
> All-
> 
> You are correct about ECMP, I encountered this 12+ months ago and forgot
> that specific details.  Mark said he put the whole AE bundle into per packet
> mode [on a short LAN hop], which can also cause reordering [not just the
> LSP] if used incorrectly.
> 
> Yes, I've specifically disabled control word.  For us, disabling control word
> avoid LSP contents being sticky to a single LAG member.  It worked for us, in
> that it solved a congestion issue carrying a high bandwidth LSP mixed with
> internet traffic on a two link bundle.  We are 100% Trio forwarding shop and
> avoid L3 ECMP [LACP only, with links having essentially the same latency
> characteristics].   YMMV, as I've been strongly reminded.
> 
> -Michael
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf
> > Of Mark Tinka
> > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 4:17 AM
> > To: Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk>; Saku Ytti
> > <saku at ytti.fi>
> > Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30/Oct/15 11:06, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> >
> > > Yes I agree that control word should definitely be enabled across the
> > board, it’s necessary on Cisco anyways.
> >
> > Enabled by default in Junos. One would have to manually turn it off.
> >
> > Mark.
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp