[j-nsp] Questions about T640

[Josh Reynolds]

Any reason to not go with the MX line here?
On Apr 10, 2016 11:55 PM, "Alireza Soltanian" <soltanian at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everybody
>
> We are going to change our M320 router with T640. There are some concerns
> about supported features on T640. We need to have following features on
> this
> router:
>
>
>
> 1-      GRE Tunnels
>
> 2-      GRE Keepalive (OAM)
>
> 3-      802.1q over 802.1ad
>
> 4-      MPLS TE
>
> 5-      ATOM VLAN re-write
>
>
>
> We need to handle up to 80Gbps of traffic. Here is the setup:
>
> For Module setup we are going to use following FPC:
>
> -          T640-FPC3-ES
>
> For Physical connections we are going to use following PICs:
>
> 1-      PC-1XGE-TYPE3-XFP-IQ2
>
> 2-      PC-1XGE-XENPAK
>
> For GRE tunnels we are going to use following PICs:
>
> PC-Tunnel
>
> For Routing Engine following item is considered:
>
> -          RE- A-2000-4096-BB
>
> For SIB:
>
> -          SIB-I-T640-B
>
> For Control Board:
>
> -          CB-L-T
>
> And for Connector interface panel:
>
> -          CIP-L-T640-S
>
> Is there anybody here who can guide me is this setup good or not and can I
> have the mentioned feature with T640? Also is there any note about required
> JunOS version of this setup?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>