[j-nsp] Questions about T640

[Alireza Soltanian]

Thank you all for your concern.

Anyway is there anyone who actually answer my questions about features which I asked before?


1-      GRE Tunnels
2-      GRE Keepalive (OAM)
3-      802.1q over 802.1ad
4-      MPLS TE
5-      ATOM VLAN re-write

 

Thank you all





From: gbrown.kiwi at gmail.com [mailto:gbrown.kiwi at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Graham Brown
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 12:28 PM
To: Jimmy <hngjimmy at gmail.com>
Cc: Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com>; Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Questions about T640

 

I'm sorry, but I'd agree with the others in that I'd replace an M series with an MX or a T series with the PTX.

 

As Jimmy has shown, the vast majority of parts have been EOL'd and if I were investing in a new device it would be the MX or PTX.

 

I'm very surprised that the T Series works out cheaper, although I'm not sure what discounts you have been quoted so this may have a significant impact.

 

If it were my network, I'd go with the MX480 or 960 as PE.

 

HTH,

Graham




Graham Brown

Twitter - @mountainrescuer <https://twitter.com/#!/mountainrescuer> 

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamcbrown> 

 

On 11 April 2016 at 19:10, Jimmy <hngjimmy at gmail.com <mailto:hngjimmy at gmail.com> > wrote:

resend

I'm sorry,
For T640, How about this announcement ?
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/1466897c24c515e6739f14c9e/files/TSB16819.pdf

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> >
wrote:


> No T640 and T4000 are still manufactured. Anyway is there anybody who can
> provide answer?
> On Apr 11, 2016 11:24 AM, "Fredrik Korsbäck" <hugge at nordu.net <mailto:hugge at nordu.net> > wrote:
>
> > You do realize that most of T-series is EOL?
> >
> > Hugge@ as2603
> >
> > > 11 Apr 2016 kl. 07:02 skrev Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> >:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Yes the price of MX Series is much higher.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Josh Reynolds [mailto:josh at kyneticwifi.com <mailto:josh at kyneticwifi.com> ]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:27 AM
> > > To: Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> >
> > > Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> >
> > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Questions about T640
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any reason to not go with the MX line here?
> > >
> > > On Apr 10, 2016 11:55 PM, "Alireza Soltanian" <soltanian at gmail.com <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> 
> > <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everybody
> > >
> > > We are going to change our M320 router with T640. There are some
> concerns
> > > about supported features on T640. We need to have following features on
> > this
> > > router:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1-      GRE Tunnels
> > >
> > > 2-      GRE Keepalive (OAM)
> > >
> > > 3-      802.1q over 802.1ad
> > >
> > > 4-      MPLS TE
> > >
> > > 5-      ATOM VLAN re-write
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We need to handle up to 80Gbps of traffic. Here is the setup:
> > >
> > > For Module setup we are going to use following FPC:
> > >
> > > -          T640-FPC3-ES
> > >
> > > For Physical connections we are going to use following PICs:
> > >
> > > 1-      PC-1XGE-TYPE3-XFP-IQ2
> > >
> > > 2-      PC-1XGE-XENPAK
> > >
> > > For GRE tunnels we are going to use following PICs:
> > >
> > > PC-Tunnel
> > >
> > > For Routing Engine following item is considered:
> > >
> > > -          RE- A-2000-4096-BB
> > >
> > > For SIB:
> > >
> > > -          SIB-I-T640-B
> > >
> > > For Control Board:
> > >
> > > -          CB-L-T
> > >
> > > And for Connector interface panel:
> > >
> > > -          CIP-L-T640-S
> > >
> > > Is there anybody here who can guide me is this setup good or not and
> can
> > I
> > > have the mentioned feature with T640? Also is there any note about
> > required
> > > JunOS version of this setup?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>  <mailto: <mailto:%0b> 
> > juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> >
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> 
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp