[j-nsp] Questions about T640

Tue Apr 12 15:54:25 EDT 2016

Have you reached out to your Juniper SE to see what they have to say?

They should be able to provide you solid information that proves the
support as well as how to convert your current MX config over to the
T-Series.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Thank you all for your concern.
>
> Anyway is there anyone who actually answer my questions about features
> which I asked before?
>
>
> 1-      GRE Tunnels
> 2-      GRE Keepalive (OAM)
> 3-      802.1q over 802.1ad
> 4-      MPLS TE
> 5-      ATOM VLAN re-write
>
>
>
> Thank you all
>
>
>
>
>
> From: gbrown.kiwi at gmail.com [mailto:gbrown.kiwi at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Graham Brown
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 12:28 PM
> To: Jimmy <hngjimmy at gmail.com>
> Cc: Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com>; Juniper List <
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Questions about T640
>
>
>
> I'm sorry, but I'd agree with the others in that I'd replace an M series
> with an MX or a T series with the PTX.
>
>
>
> As Jimmy has shown, the vast majority of parts have been EOL'd and if I
> were investing in a new device it would be the MX or PTX.
>
>
>
> I'm very surprised that the T Series works out cheaper, although I'm not
> sure what discounts you have been quoted so this may have a significant
> impact.
>
>
>
> If it were my network, I'd go with the MX480 or 960 as PE.
>
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Graham
>
>
>
>
> Graham Brown
>
> Twitter - @mountainrescuer <https://twitter.com/#!/mountainrescuer>
>
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamcbrown>
>
>
>
> On 11 April 2016 at 19:10, Jimmy <hngjimmy at gmail.com <mailto:
> hngjimmy at gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> resend
>
> I'm sorry,
> For T640, How about this announcement ?
> https://gallery.mailchimp.com/1466897c24c515e6739f14c9e/files/TSB16819.pdf
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com
> <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> >
> wrote:
>
>
> > No T640 and T4000 are still manufactured. Anyway is there anybody who can
> > provide answer?
> > On Apr 11, 2016 11:24 AM, "Fredrik Korsbäck" <hugge at nordu.net <mailto:
> hugge at nordu.net> > wrote:
> >
> > > You do realize that most of T-series is EOL?
> > >
> > > Hugge@ as2603
> > >
> > > > 11 Apr 2016 kl. 07:02 skrev Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com
> <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> >:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Yes the price of MX Series is much higher.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Josh Reynolds [mailto:josh at kyneticwifi.com <mailto:
> josh at kyneticwifi.com> ]
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:27 AM
> > > > To: Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com <mailto:
> soltanian at gmail.com> >
> > > > Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> >
> > > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Questions about T640
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any reason to not go with the MX line here?
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 10, 2016 11:55 PM, "Alireza Soltanian" <soltanian at gmail.com
> <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com <mailto:soltanian at gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi everybody
> > > >
> > > > We are going to change our M320 router with T640. There are some
> > concerns
> > > > about supported features on T640. We need to have following features
> on
> > > this
> > > > router:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1-      GRE Tunnels
> > > >
> > > > 2-      GRE Keepalive (OAM)
> > > >
> > > > 3-      802.1q over 802.1ad
> > > >
> > > > 4-      MPLS TE
> > > >
> > > > 5-      ATOM VLAN re-write
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We need to handle up to 80Gbps of traffic. Here is the setup:
> > > >
> > > > For Module setup we are going to use following FPC:
> > > >
> > > > -          T640-FPC3-ES
> > > >
> > > > For Physical connections we are going to use following PICs:
> > > >
> > > > 1-      PC-1XGE-TYPE3-XFP-IQ2
> > > >
> > > > 2-      PC-1XGE-XENPAK
> > > >
> > > > For GRE tunnels we are going to use following PICs:
> > > >
> > > > PC-Tunnel
> > > >
> > > > For Routing Engine following item is considered:
> > > >
> > > > -          RE- A-2000-4096-BB
> > > >
> > > > For SIB:
> > > >
> > > > -          SIB-I-T640-B
> > > >
> > > > For Control Board:
> > > >
> > > > -          CB-L-T
> > > >
> > > > And for Connector interface panel:
> > > >
> > > > -          CIP-L-T640-S
> > > >
> > > > Is there anybody here who can guide me is this setup good or not and
> > can
> > > I
> > > > have the mentioned feature with T640? Also is there any note about
> > > required
> > > > JunOS version of this setup?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>  <mailto: <mailto:%0b>
> > > juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> >
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>