[j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40
Amarjeet Singh
techie.logging at gmail.com
Sat Apr 16 19:46:11 EDT 2016
Hello - HW for MX40 & MX80 is same.
No HW upgrade needed to MX40->MX80, it's just software license required
MX40 allows to use built in 2 x 10G ports out of total 4,
Where MX80 allows to use all 4 x 10G ports.
I would not recommend refurbished routers.
Br, Amarjeet
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:30:14 -0400
> From: Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com>
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?
> Message-ID:
> <CAPgF-fq5rTRGvn1k-+CdRzihQhn6AqPhy8n=
> f7_PXZ6qOH0gtw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> My requirement is 10G fiber link terminate on router but in future we
> can go with 20G link so should i consider MX80 or MX40 (cost wise
> also)
>
> If we buy MX80 so in base model it comes with 4x10G fiber ports right?
> or do i need to buy them separately after buying MX80 chassis?
>
> Additionally do i need to buy license separately to activate 10G port?
> because in Cisco ASR1000 chassis you need to buy fiber module
> extension, plue Activation license.. Very costly..
>
>
> I have check some website they are also selling refurbished or used
> which which in good deal should i think about that because buying to
> MX80 for hardware redundancy will almost bankrupt us ;)
>
> what do you suggest?
>
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list