[j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40

[Olivier Benghozi]

By the way, if you buy new routers, notice that End of Sale for MX5/10/40/80 is to be announced this year (not RoHS2 compliant). They are replaced by MX104 (coming in various license packages to replicate the licensing model of MX5/10/40).

> Le 17 avr. 2016 à 01:46, Amarjeet Singh <techie.logging at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hello -  HW for MX40 & MX80 is same.
> No HW upgrade needed to MX40->MX80, it's just software license required
> 
> MX40 allows to use built in 2 x 10G ports out of total 4,
> Where MX80 allows to use all 4 x 10G ports.
> 
> I would not recommend refurbished routers.
> 
> Br, Amarjeet
> 
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:30:14 -0400
>> From: Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com>
>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?
>> Message-ID:
>>        <CAPgF-fq5rTRGvn1k-+CdRzihQhn6AqPhy8n=
>> f7_PXZ6qOH0gtw at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> 
>> My requirement is 10G fiber link terminate on router but in future we
>> can go with 20G link so should i consider MX80 or MX40 (cost wise
>> also)
>> 
>> If we buy MX80 so in base model it comes with 4x10G fiber ports right?
>> or do i need to buy them separately after buying MX80 chassis?
>> 
>> Additionally do i need to buy license separately to activate 10G port?
>> because in Cisco ASR1000 chassis you need to buy fiber module
>> extension, plue Activation license.. Very costly..
>> 
>> 
>> I have check some website they are also selling refurbished or used
>> which which in good deal should i think about that because buying to
>> MX80 for hardware redundancy will almost bankrupt us ;)
>> 
>> what do you suggest?