[j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?

[Edward Dore]

> On 18 Apr 2016, at 00:34, Matthew Crocker <matthew at corp.crocker.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Apr 16, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Chris Adams <cma at cmadams.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> MX5 through MX80 are the same physical hardware, with all the same
>> physical ports built-in.  The lower models have some ports disabled by
>> licenses; only buy what you need today, and you can "upgrade" with a
>> license purchase later to enable more ports.
> 
> I’ve tried to upgrade my MX10 to an MX80 and it was cheaper to buy an MX80 outright and junk the MX10 :/

The same is true of going from the MX104-MX5 bundle to the MX104-40G bundle - the MX104-40G-AC-BNDL is slightly cheaper than the MX104-MX5-40G-UPG license to upgrade an existing chassis!

Juniper couldn't see a problem with this when I raised it with them...

Edward Dore
Freethought Internet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20160418/579c32a7/attachment.sig>