[j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?

Satish Patel satish.txt at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 09:39:30 EDT 2016


Other cheap option I have Cisco ASR 920 which has 2 10G fiber port. 

It hold 20k routes limit but any way we are planning to run default router over BGP

Does this router has 20G traffic performance? 

--
Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 18, 2016, at 3:33 AM, Edward Dore <edward.dore at freethought-internet.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 18 Apr 2016, at 00:34, Matthew Crocker <matthew at corp.crocker.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 16, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Chris Adams <cma at cmadams.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> MX5 through MX80 are the same physical hardware, with all the same
>>> physical ports built-in.  The lower models have some ports disabled by
>>> licenses; only buy what you need today, and you can "upgrade" with a
>>> license purchase later to enable more ports.
>> 
>> I’ve tried to upgrade my MX10 to an MX80 and it was cheaper to buy an MX80 outright and junk the MX10 :/
> 
> The same is true of going from the MX104-MX5 bundle to the MX104-40G bundle - the MX104-40G-AC-BNDL is slightly cheaper than the MX104-MX5-40G-UPG license to upgrade an existing chassis!
> 
> Juniper couldn't see a problem with this when I raised it with them...
> 
> Edward Dore
> Freethought Internet
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list