[j-nsp] MPLS L2VPN Cisco and Juniper

[Alexander Arseniev]

Yes it does.
Olive + L2VPN is a special case since only Intel PRO 100 (fxp0) and 
Interl PRO 1000 (em0) NICs are supported by Olive, and AFAIK, these 
cards firmware doesn't support L2VPN data plane operations.
Olive + L3VPN does work fine, both control and data plane.
Thx
Alex

On 18/04/2016 19:59, Aaron wrote:
> Thanks Alex, does it work on vMX ?
>
> Aaron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Alexander Arseniev
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 11:26 AM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS L2VPN Cisco and Juniper
>
> Hello,
> If You are doing the below JUNOS config on Olive, L2circuit data plane does
> not work on Olive.
> And it never worked on Olive, to my knowledge.
> HTH
> Thx
> Alex
>
> On 18/04/2016 13:32, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
>> I have configured the below
>> set interfaces em0 mtu 1514
>> set interfaces em0 unit 0 family inet address 192.168.101.10/24 set
>> interfaces em0 unit 0 family mpls mtu 1500 set interfaces em1
>> vlan-tagging set interfaces em1 unit 100 encapsulation vlan-ccc set
>> interfaces em1 unit 100 vlan-id 100 set interfaces em1 unit 100 family
>> ccc set interfaces lo0 unit 0 family inet address 10.10.10.10/32 set
>> routing-options router-id 10.10.10.10 set routing-options
>> autonomous-system 20 set protocols mpls interface em0.0 set protocols
>> mpls interface lo0.0 set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface em0.0
>> set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface lo0.0 set protocols ldp
>> interface em0.0 set protocols ldp interface lo0.0 set protocols
>> l2circuit neighbor 1.1.1.1 interface em1.100 virtual-circuit-id 100
>>
>> router ospf 1
>>    router-id 1.1.1.1
>>    network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>    network 192.168.101.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 R1#sh run int f1/1.100 Building
>> configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 107 bytes
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet1/1.100
>>    encapsulation dot1Q 100
>>    xconnect 10.10.10.10 100 encapsulation mpls end
>>
>> But its not working even the circuit is up (not working means no ping
>> between CEs)
>>
>> BR,
>> Mohammad
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Thanks Steinar
>>> So we are talking about xconnect from Cisco side and l2circuit from
>>> Juniper side right?
>>> Do you have a running template please?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Mohammad
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:49 PM, <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Am trying to configure MPLS L2VPN between Cisco and Juniper I know
>>>>> in Cisco VPLS and xconnect In juniper l2vpn and l2circuit (Kompella
>>>>> and Martini respectively) What are the compatible methods to follow
>>>>> in this case?
>>>> Point to point (pseudowire, Martini tunnel) is very much
>>>> interoperable between Cisco and Juniper. We have lots of these in
> operation.
>>>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>