[j-nsp] MPLS L2VPN Cisco and Juniper

[Mohammad Khalil]

Thanks Mark
I just want to check if the configuration I pasted do work (actually am
testing this in GNS3 and am not sure if it will work due to limitations)

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

>
>
> On 19/Apr/16 08:59, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark
> > Yes am aware dear , but what made me confused that I read some
> > inter-operability issues in one of the forums
> > What my customer needs is to build generally l2 VPN circuit and he is
> > wondering which to follow
> > The main setup is ASR9K and MX which are running in different ASs , so
> > what inter-as option will be the more scalable and is there any
> > limitation from the ASR9K line card ?
>
> If you're doing straight LDP-based EoMPLS pw's, then this is vanilla.
>
> If you're doing BGP-based EoMPLS pw's that are not VPLS/EVPN, I know
> this is what Juniper call(ed) L2VPN. Cisco did not support this back in
> the day, but since they now support BGP AD for VPLS/EVPN, there might be
> support for this; I'm not sure.
>
> The only time we consider signaling pw's via BGP is if we're doing VPLS
> or EVPN, not point-to-point circuits.
>
> Mark.
>
>