[j-nsp] BGP/MPLS Question MX Platform

[Matthew Crocker]

Couldn’t you just use your local pref on the BGP sessions for Internet prefixes to push the traffic over the other links?

Or, if you never want INET traffic over the link put a filter on the announcements for the two neighbors and don’t send full tables.


—

Matthew Crocker
President - Crocker Communications, Inc.
Managing Partner - Crocker Telecommunications, LLC
E: matthew at corp.crocker.com
E: matthew at crocker.com


> On Aug 2, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Dean Bolton <jnprlist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I know enough about RSVP(-TE) to be dangerous and I can see how I could
> force strict paths for LSPs, etc. but I am not quite understanding how I
> would prevent BGP from using a specific with it.  Would you care to share
> an example if you have one?
> 
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/Aug/16 22:35, Dean Bolton wrote:
>> 
>> I haven't tested it, but one thought I had was to put MPLS/LDP inside
>> logical systems on the nodes and only include the A-C link inside the
>> logical systems.  In theory this should work but seems a bit of a
>> hack...but maybe I'm down to hacks to make this work anyway..lol
>> 
>> 
>> RSVP-TE would be more elegant.
>> 
>> Mark.
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>