[j-nsp] Juniper ACX
Aaron
aaron1 at gvtc.com
Tue Feb 23 08:37:18 EST 2016
I had a couple different flavors of Cisco ASR920 in my lab recently but
dropped it from consideration since it top'ed out at (6) 10 gig interfaces.
I opted for the Juniper ACX5048 since it's got (48) 10 gig and (6) 40 gig -
so a possible total of (72) 10 gig interfaces.
I tested L3VPN on ACX5048 and it looked good.
I tested L2VPN VPLS BGP Auto Discovered w/BGP Sig and /LDP Sig and both were
functional.
Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Tinka
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:31 AM
To: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>; Johan Borch <johan.borch at gmail.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper ACX
On 9/Feb/16 17:34, Saku Ytti wrote:
> ACX covers many boxes with different HW. ACX2k is BRCM Enduro, as is
> Cisco ASR901. My comments are about ACX2k.
>
>
> VPLS is not supported, and I don't think it ever will be.
>
> Only way to protect control-plane would be forwarding filter where you
> match local addresses or implementing it in all interfaces. So not
> really.
>
> Firewall filters are funky, like you can't match to prefix-lists at
> all, you have to enumerate all the addresses in the firewall filter
> itself, which is peculiar, considering this is not HW feature.
> IPV6 FW filters weren't supported at all when I tested them.
>
> Very few IFL can have counters enabled (disabled by default)
>
> Shaper calculates L2 rate, which I think is categorically wrong.
>
>
> If you can live with the limitations, it can be useful and affordable
> box, but be sure that the CAPEX benefit is sufficient to justify the
> inherent complexity of running HW with limited HW capabilities.
As I've mentioned before on this list, we dropped it due to lack of NG-MVPN
support (limitation in the Broadcom chip used on the platform).
Juniper have no plans to get a custom, cheap chip in there.
So we went with Cisco's ASR920. Does everything we want for half the price
of their ME3600X platform, and works just like a regular ASR1000 router.
When Juniper wise-up, we shall revisit; but not until then.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list