[j-nsp] Juniper ACX

Aaron aaron1 at gvtc.com
Tue Feb 23 08:37:18 EST 2016


I had a couple different flavors of Cisco ASR920 in my lab recently but
dropped it from consideration since it top'ed out at (6) 10 gig interfaces.
I opted for the Juniper ACX5048 since it's got (48) 10 gig and (6) 40 gig -
so a possible total of (72) 10 gig interfaces.

I tested L3VPN on ACX5048 and it looked good.

I tested L2VPN VPLS BGP Auto Discovered w/BGP Sig and /LDP Sig and both were
functional.

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Tinka
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:31 AM
To: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>; Johan Borch <johan.borch at gmail.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper ACX



On 9/Feb/16 17:34, Saku Ytti wrote:

> ACX covers many boxes with different HW. ACX2k is BRCM Enduro, as is 
> Cisco ASR901. My comments are about ACX2k.
>
>
> VPLS is not supported, and I don't think it ever will be.
>
> Only way to protect control-plane would be forwarding filter where you 
> match local addresses or implementing it in all interfaces. So not 
> really.
>
> Firewall filters are funky, like you can't match to prefix-lists at 
> all, you have to enumerate all the addresses in the firewall filter 
> itself, which is peculiar, considering this is not HW feature.
> IPV6 FW filters weren't supported at all when I tested them.
>
> Very few IFL can have counters enabled (disabled by default)
>
> Shaper calculates L2 rate, which I think is categorically wrong.
>
>
> If you can live with the limitations, it can be useful and affordable 
> box, but be sure that the CAPEX benefit is sufficient to justify the 
> inherent complexity of running HW with limited HW capabilities.

As I've mentioned before on this list, we dropped it due to lack of NG-MVPN
support (limitation in the Broadcom chip used on the platform).

Juniper have no plans to get a custom, cheap chip in there.

So we went with Cisco's ASR920. Does everything we want for half the price
of their ME3600X platform, and works just like a regular ASR1000 router.

When Juniper wise-up, we shall revisit; but not until then.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list