[j-nsp] Is there a noticeable performance difference between the RE-S-2000 and the RE-S-1800-X4 when rebuilding the FIB?

[joel jaeggli]

On 2/25/16 12:59 AM, v wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> let's assume a link goes down. The router (in our case a MX960) will
> have to rebuild the FIB in order to stop sending data to that
> interface.
> 
> Is there a performance difference in such a case between the
> RE-S-2000 and the RE-S-1800-X4? How long does that process take for
> you? I know that with the smaller REs it can take ages. :)

back with I had re2ks and the ability to test that sort of thing (2012)
they converged about 8k routes a second which resulted in the ingest of
a full table (in 2012) in under a minute.

> Regards v _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp
> mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20160227/b3673b93/attachment.sig>