[j-nsp] Q re: 6PE on a native IPv6 enabled network

Michael Hare michael.hare at wisc.edu
Mon Jan 11 13:53:17 EST 2016


j-nsp,

I'd to deploy 6PE on an existing dual stack network so that native IPv6 prefixes can take advantage of path benefits MPLS has to offer.  In my setup it seems that traffic from PE1 to PE2 [PE2 router id: x.x.32.8] is being load balanced between MPLS and native IPv6, showing equal cost protocol next hops of ::ffff:x.x.32.8 and y:y:0:100::8.

If I want to force all v6 traffic into MPLS, is the only solution to disable native family inet6 iBGP between PE and RR, or is there a way to make the native IPv6 protocol next hop less preferable in some way?

-Michael

/////////////////

Please note equal cost path to z:z::/32 which is learned from CE on PE2.

user at PE1-re0> show route z:z:: active-path           

inet6.0: 213 destinations, 287 routes (213 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

z:z::/32     *[BGP/170] 6d 06:17:47, MED 0, localpref 2020, from y:y:0:100::a
                      AS path: 46103 I, validation-state: unverified
                      to x.x.33.123 via ae0.3449, Push 301680
                      to x.x.33.130 via ae2.3459, Push 315408
                    > to fe80::86b5:9c0d:790d:d7f0 via ae0.3449
                      to fe80::86b5:9c0d:8393:d92a via ae2.3459

user at PE1-re0> show route z:z:: active-path detail 

inet6.0: 213 destinations, 287 routes (213 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
z:z::/32 (5 entries, 1 announced)
        *BGP    Preference: 170/-2021
                Next hop type: Indirect
                Address: 0x3574754
                Next-hop reference count: 6
                Source: y:y:0:100::a
                Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 1048816
                Next hop: x.x.33.123 via ae0.3449 weight 0x1
                Label operation: Push 301680
                Label TTL action: prop-ttl
                Load balance label: Label 301680: None; 
                Session Id: 0x151
                Next hop: x.x.33.130 via ae2.3459 weight 0xf000
                Label operation: Push 315408
                Label TTL action: prop-ttl
                Load balance label: Label 315408: None; 
                Session Id: 0x14f
                Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 1048583
                Next hop: fe80::86b5:9c0d:790d:d7f0 via ae0.3449 weight 0x1, selected
                Session Id: 0x14b
                Next hop: fe80::86b5:9c0d:8393:d92a via ae2.3459 weight 0xf000
                Session Id: 0x143
                Protocol next hop: ::ffff:x.x.32.8
                Indirect next hop: 0x358f478 1048718 INH Session ID: 0x1e7
                Protocol next hop: y:y:0:100::8
                Indirect next hop: 0x35d8b68 1048578 INH Session ID: 0x14e
                State: <Active Int Ext>
                Local AS: 65400 Peer AS: 65400
                Age: 6d 6:17:39         Metric: 0       Metric2: 2055 
                Validation State: unverified 
                Task: BGP_65400.y:y:0:100::a+179
                Announcement bits (3): 0-KRT 2-RT 6-Resolve tree 2 
...
...


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list