[j-nsp] SRX Is 12.3X48 already mature?

[Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr]

Hi,

Just upgraded an SRX5600 HA cluster from 12.1X46-D20 to 12.3X48-20 without any problem... so far (3 weeks ;-).

Only issue we encountered was with ISSU not accepting too much lt interfaces between multiple L-SYSs, there is a listed PR in junos 12.3X48 release notes.

No matter what we tried (deleting some / all of the lt interfaces), ISSU wouldn't go through and quit everytime. JTAC recommenced we do that the old fashion way, we ended UP rebooting the cluster :-/

In the end, all seems to be working for now. We'll definitly give ISSU a try next time we upgrade.

HTH.

Y.



> Le 25 janv. 2016 à 17:19, Christian Beyerlein <christian.beyerlein+juniper-nsp at net-m.de> a écrit :
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Does anyone already use 12.3X48 on datacenter SRX (SRX3600 HA)?
> 
> We are currently on 12.1X44 and would like to skip 12.1X46 and 12.1X47, but 12.3X48 is not yet "JTAC recommended".
> 
> Any stability issues observed? Will ISSU work from 12.1X44?
> 
> We use only basic features, FW/NAT and ALG for RTSP/SUNRPC, no IDP or sth like that.
> 
> BR
>  Christian
> -- 
> Christian Beyerlein
> Senior System Engineer
> 
> net mobile AG
> Fritz-Vomfelde-Str. 26-30
> DE 40547 Düsseldorf
> 
> Tel. +49 (0) 211 97020-950
> 
> Registergericht:     Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 48022
> Vorstand:            Edgar Schnorpfeil (Vorsitzender),
>                     Simone Wittstruck,
>                     Imran Khan
> 
> Vorsitzender des
> Aufsichtsrates:      Hiroyuki Sato
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp