[j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

Colton Conor colton.conor at gmail.com
Mon May 2 09:08:40 EDT 2016


So that would replace what, their currently MX5 through MX240 line of
products? Why would Juniper do that when they already have products that
meet those specifications? Don't get me wrong I would love to see the same
box, but I just have a hard time believing big J and C are going to make a
small dense box like we all want at a competitive price point. They might
be forced to with Arista's new offerings however.

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Harald F. Karlsen <elfkin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30.04.2016 11:49, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>> When the vendors figure out how to deliver cheap 10Gbps ports on custom
>> chips in a 1U chassis, I'll be the first one to buy.
>>
>
> +1
>
> I'd love to see a 1U (or 2U 300mm deep) TRIO-based metro device with >20
> 1/10G interfaces (with proper buffers and QoS) and 2-4 40/100G interfaces.
> Preferably with a decent control-plane as well (Intel Atom or Xeon) and at
> a competitive price.
>
> --
> Harald
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list