[j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

raf raph at futomaki.net
Mon May 9 08:39:04 EDT 2016



Le 06/05/2016 à 19:17, Aaron a écrit :
> As I recall, vpls bgp ad w/ldp sig worked interop between all these....
>
>   Cisco ASR9K
>   Cisco ASR920 (2 flavors as I recall)
>   Cisco ASR903
>   Cisco ME3600
>   Juniper MX104
>   Juniper ACX5048
>
> ... all those in same vpls elan
Cool.

> My l3vpn mpls vrf (routing-instance) on ACX is working fine... i learned
> that it's different than cisco whereas static and direct connect routes are
> automagically advertised into the vpl .... so I wonder if this is what you
> mean by auto-export.  If so, yes it's working. (I'm fairly new to Juniper,
> and been doing cisco for several years and am accustomed to cisco mpls l3vpn
> requiring redistribution of static and connected routes explicitly
> configured)

If you use 'vrf-target' stanza, by default all route with these extended 
community will be imported and exported.
The auto-export 'stanza' allow to do local route leaking between two (or 
more) vrfs.
This is this special feature that do not work on EX4550 which force do 
to strange things.
> ... what do you mean by "worked on tagged link?"  if you mean am I tagging
> the PE-CE handoff then the answer is yes... I get tagged frames on PE-CE, I
> put those into a vlan, I put irb on top of vlan and I vrf (routing-instance)
> the irb. Done.  Works.
I mean using a tagged link between P-PE. This is not recommended and I 
prefer back to back untag link for the core, but in some case it can be 
helpful.


> I did a quick ELINE EVPL (mef-speak for vlan- based pw) which I think is
> what you mean by ldp-based l2circuit... ( I did set protocols l2circuit
> neighbor 1.1.1.1 interface ge-0/0/38.0 virtual-circuit-id 999 , ge-0/0/38.0
> has encap vlan-ccc vlan-id 17 and family ccc) and did this to the other side
> which was a cisco me3600 ( I need to test 9k soon and will ) ...me3600 was a
> interface with service instance encap dot1q 17 rewrite sym pop thing and
> xconnect 1.1.1.2 999 encap mpls)  .... works... done.
OK cool.
> I want/need to test mef eline epl (port based l2circuit to carry all vlans)
>
> I want/need to test mef etree eptree/evptree since I support some of that
> too in my network, but not as much as eline and elan
>
> Acx label stack ?  dunno.... did I read 3 somewhere ?  don't recall....
>
> Snmp counter on vlan or subint ?  dunno yet  but will probably soon find out
> as solarwinds is watching a couple of my deployed acx's...  check back
> later.
>
>
Thks for all theses feedbacks.

--
Raphael Mazelier



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list