[j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

[Javier Valero]

Hi,

We had a bad experience with MX960 and 16.1R3. We were affected by multiple PRs. Some of them silent and "malicious" 😉.

However, we have a good experience with 15.1 on 4550 and 4200.
Which problems did you found on it?

Regards.
Javier Valero | IslaLink / OranLink


-----Mensaje original-----
De: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] En nombre de Karl Gerhard
Enviado el: martes, 12 de diciembre de 2017 10:53
Para: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Asunto: [j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

Hello

we've had very bad experience with Junos 15.1 on our switches (EX4550, EX4300, EX4200).
Now we're getting new MX960s with 2xRE-S-X6-64G and unfortunately the minimum required Junos version for this RE is 15.1. Can anyone share their experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960? Is it as bad as it is on the switches? Would it be wiser to jump directly to 16.1/16.2/17.1/17.2/17.3?

We're especially interested in bugs/problems related to MC-LAG.

Regards
Karl
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp