[j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

[Olivier Benghozi]

We've been running 16.1R4-S3 or S4 for 4/5 months (we had to choose between 15.1F and 16.1R for our MPC7s), without MC-LAG.
We've been hit by about 8 PR, including 4 non-cosmetic ones (with 3 also present in 15.1F anyway).
Most of them are allegedly fixed in 16.1R6.
17 might be the next step in 6 months.

> On 12 dec. 2017 at 22:01, Nikolas Geyer <nik at neko.id.au> wrote :
> 
> We’re running 16.1R4 and it’s been stable for the most part, aside from a few annoying cosmetic problems.
> 
> Running it on MX480’s and 960’s, a variety of RE’s, a variety of MPC2/MPC3/MPC4/MPC7, usual protocols such as BGP, OSPF, MPLS, RSVP and a few Tbps of traffic. No MC-LAG unfortunately though.
> 
> Will probably schedule moving up to 17 some time early 2018.