[j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

[Michael Hare]

We are looking at moving to 16.1R6 within the new few weeks on an MX2010 from 14.1.  Several folks have mentioned cosmetics bugs in 16.1.  If anyone is willing to highlight (publically or privately) PRs or high level descriptions of the cosmetic issues (no more than a sentence), I'd be curious.  Admittedly I can read the release notes, but there is value in hearing from others what cosmetics bugs affected them.

-Michael

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
>>Of Olivier Benghozi
>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 4:45 PM
>>To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?
>>
>>We've been running 16.1R4-S3 or S4 for 4/5 months (we had to choose
>>between 15.1F and 16.1R for our MPC7s), without MC-LAG.
>>We've been hit by about 8 PR, including 4 non-cosmetic ones (with 3 also
>>present in 15.1F anyway).
>>Most of them are allegedly fixed in 16.1R6.
>>17 might be the next step in 6 months.
>>
>>> On 12 dec. 2017 at 22:01, Nikolas Geyer <nik at neko.id.au> wrote :
>>>
>>> We’re running 16.1R4 and it’s been stable for the most part, aside from a
>>few annoying cosmetic problems.
>>>
>>> Running it on MX480’s and 960’s, a variety of RE’s, a variety of
>>MPC2/MPC3/MPC4/MPC7, usual protocols such as BGP, OSPF, MPLS, RSVP
>>and a few Tbps of traffic. No MC-LAG unfortunately though.
>>>
>>> Will probably schedule moving up to 17 some time early 2018.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp