[j-nsp] R: Q in Q on EX 4500 / 4200

[Laurent CARON]

Thanks Lucio,

It perfectly matches with my empirical findings, but just wanted to make 
sure I didn't miss the obvious.

I'll then have to add an intermediate EX to strip/add a VLAN tag as 
needed...ugly... :(

On 17/01/2017 14:52, Valentini, Lucio wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as far as I know, no. there is a complete separation between S-LAN and C-LAN; local VLANs can be S-LANs, if you are a provider, or C-LANs, if you are a customer; but you cannot manage an S-LAN if you are a customer or manage a C-LAN if you are a provider.
> 
> However some time ago somebody told you can do that with an MX router, but never with an EX switch.
> 
> I hope this helps
> 
> Lucio
> 
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] Per conto di Laurent CARON
> Inviato: martedì 17 gennaio 2017 13:59
> A: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Oggetto: [j-nsp] Q in Q on EX 4500 / 4200
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to achieve the following:
> - One of my providers is handing to me a Q-in-Q link
> - Each S-VLAN is heading to a remote site
> - Each C-VLAN range is mapped to a S-VLAN
> 
> Is there a way with only EX4500/4200 (no hairpin, no second device to pop the S-VLAN tags) to terminate any C-VLAN to a local (on the EX) l3 interface ?
> 
> Juniper support website is most of the time contradictory with itself...
> 
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:587e21f0320612133917485!
>