[j-nsp] It is about cisco command

[Saku Ytti]

I mean operationally difference from JunOS to IOS/IOS-XR. In each
case, policy must exist in config, but must not be applied to customer
to achieve what you want.

So I do not understand your need for Cisco to implement 'test', I do
not understand what is missing, operationally.

On 22 March 2017 at 15:38, Brijesh Patel <brju.patel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe so many diffrence between IOS and IOS-Xr. I am not 100% sure what
> ares. Sorry
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
>>
>> On 22 March 2017 at 14:58, Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikolajek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > You can use test policy when policy statment is commiteted. Is in active
>> > configuration. If is not commited You get error: Policy referencje but
>> > not
>> > defined.
>>
>> Quite. Which is why I'm struggling to understand what is the
>> difference to IOS/IOS-XR?
>>
>> --
>>   ++ytti
>
>



-- 
  ++ytti