[j-nsp] It is about cisco command

[Tomasz Mikołajek]

I was writting about Junos not IOS.

W dniu śr., 22.03.2017 o 14:58 Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> napisał(a):

> I mean operationally difference from JunOS to IOS/IOS-XR. In each
> case, policy must exist in config, but must not be applied to customer
> to achieve what you want.
>
> So I do not understand your need for Cisco to implement 'test', I do
> not understand what is missing, operationally.
>
> On 22 March 2017 at 15:38, Brijesh Patel <brju.patel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I believe so many diffrence between IOS and IOS-Xr. I am not 100% sure
> what
> > ares. Sorry
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22 March 2017 at 14:58, Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikolajek at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > You can use test policy when policy statment is commiteted. Is in
> active
> >> > configuration. If is not commited You get error: Policy referencje but
> >> > not
> >> > defined.
> >>
> >> Quite. Which is why I'm struggling to understand what is the
> >> difference to IOS/IOS-XR?
> >>
> >> --
> >>   ++ytti
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>   ++ytti
>