[j-nsp] BGP4-MIB-v2

[Jeff Haas]

> On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:15 PM, Jeff Haas <jhaas at juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Vincent Bernat <bernat at luffy.cx> wrote:
>> 
>> ❦ 27 mars 2017 19:26 GMT, Jeff Haas <jhaas at juniper.net> :
>> 
>>> To your relevant next point: If the junos mib is in error, what to do about it?
>>> 
>>> Very likely fixing the issue will cause mass amounts of unhappiness as
>>> people's existing scripts and mib walking code fails due to the new
>>> sub-indices.
>>> 
>>> do the right thing, create misery? Leave it as is, document that it's
>>> wrong?
>> 
>> I totally understand it's not possible to just fix the issue. Your best
>> bet is to convert the draft into a RFC and fix the issue here! ;-)
> 
> After checking with Jürgen about RFC 4001 encoding (no better answer!) he confirms that we're missing the variable length length field in our generated OIDs.
> 
> I'll make a point of filing a PR on this.  As noted elsewhere in thread, solving it might be ... interesting.

PR 1265504

-- Jeff