[j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001
Stephen Fulton
sf at lists.esoteric.ca
Sun Nov 12 10:14:48 EST 2017
Jason,
For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the
MX204 for a bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks
like break out cables are an option for adding lower speed interfaces.
-- Stephen
On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I’m looking to get a basic handle on the Juniper equivalent to some Cisco kit that’s out there.
>
> For a NCS5001 comparison, the use case is a simple ISIS, LDP BGP-Free P Core LSR. QFX5110 seem to be closest. Fair?
>
> For a NCS5501-SE comparison, the use case would be for a peering router with a big FIB, ISIS, LDP and MP-BGP. I’m having a hard time finding a comparison in the same form factor. Is there one?
>
> Finally, for the ASR9001 comparison, the use case would be the same as the NCS5001-SE case, but for much, much smaller sites. On paper, it looks as though the MX80 would be the direct comparison here?
>
> Thanks folks!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list