[j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

[Jared Mauch]

I would be looking at the QFX10K or the QFX52xx series. Chat with your account team for the latest. 

Jared Mauch

> On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Stephen Fulton <sf at lists.esoteric.ca> wrote:
> 
> Jason,
> 
> For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80.  I'd look at the MX204 for a bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks like break out cables are an option for adding lower speed interfaces.
> 
> -- Stephen
> 
>> On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>> Hey there,
>> I’m looking to get a basic handle on the Juniper equivalent to some Cisco kit that’s out there.
>> For a NCS5001 comparison, the use case is a simple ISIS, LDP BGP-Free P Core LSR.  QFX5110 seem to be closest.  Fair?
>> For a NCS5501-SE comparison, the use case would be for a peering router with a big FIB, ISIS, LDP and MP-BGP.  I’m having a hard time finding a comparison in the same form factor.  Is there one?
>> Finally, for the ASR9001 comparison, the use case would be the same as the NCS5001-SE case, but for much, much smaller sites.  On paper, it looks as though the MX80 would be the direct comparison here?
>> Thanks folks!
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp