[j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?
Sebastian Becker
sb at lab.dtag.de
Tue Nov 14 07:27:19 EST 2017
The enhanced midplane allows you already to use higher bandwidth with redundancy at least on the MX960. 205G per slot (not enhanced) against 240G per slot (enhanced) So if you want to use a MPC5E-100G10G and populate every port (2x100G plus 4x10G) you need the enhanced midplane and the SCBE2. Same for the MPC5E-40G10G and the Q-Versions of these cards. Otherwise you overbook the midplane.
—
Sebastian Becker
> Am 14.11.2017 um 11:38 schrieb Olivier Benghozi <olivier.benghozi at wifirst.fr>:
>
>
> While I don't care about SONET/SDH in 2017 (sorry...), the enhanced midplane (in the MX240/480/960 MX generation) also (mainly?) allows more bandwidth per slot with the future SCBE3.
> You may find a fugitive Juniper 2016 PDF on your preferred search engine ("SCBE3" "premium3" "mx").
>
>> On 14 nov. 2017 at 09:56, Karl Gerhard <karl_gerh at gmx.at> wrote :
>>
>> this article is mentioning an enhanced MX480 midplane. This is the first time I hear of that: CHAS-BP-MX480-S (=Non-Enhanced) vs. CHAS-BP3-MX480-S (=Enhanced)
>> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/scbe2-mx480-desc.html
>>
>> Is there anyone who can give more details about the enhanced midplane?
>> As far as I understand the cross-coupling of clock input is only related to SONET/SDH stuff, is that correct?
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list