[j-nsp] Standard practice for customer eBGP peering traffic engineer
Mark Tees
marktees at gmail.com
Wed Oct 25 23:16:42 EDT 2017
Hi Craig,
They are probably referring to prepending the provider AS to certain
other eBGP neighbours not within the AS.
EG: Customer sends prefix X with community Y. Where provider chooses
to advertise prefix X to other eBGP neighbours if they match community
Y then prepend own AS.
https://us.ntt.net/support/policy/routing.cfm
http://tools.vocus.com.au/additionals/communities.htm
https://onestep.net/communities/as3356/
These are convenience methods to assist IP transit customers on
guiding traffic towards their prefixes.
--Mark
On 26 October 2017 at 10:07, craig washington
<craigwashington01 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> wondering best practice for customer eBGP traffic engineering.
>
> We currently use local preference and let the customer send us a community to adjust but I had a call with a customer today and they mentioned a provider letting them send a community to have the providers AS prepended on their route? Is this possible? Won't that cause a loop inside of the provider once the other IBGP routers see their own AS number?
>
>
> If this is done is there a good workaround in juniper or some good documentation to get it to work or should we just let the customer send us prepends using their own AS number.
>
>
> thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Regards,
Mark L. Tees
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list