[j-nsp] MX204 and copper SFP?

[Thomas Bellman]

On 2018-04-04 21:09, Niall Donaghy wrote:

> Even more sad to see that 1G ports retain their xe- naming rather than
> changing to ge- as you would hope and expect.

I have never understood the reason for having different names for
ports depending on the speed of the transceiver.  To me, it just
makes things more confusing.

Can someone enlighten me on the benefits of that?


	/Bellman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20180405/512269bc/attachment.sig>