[j-nsp] MX204 and copper SFP?

[Saku Ytti]

Since of the fathers.

'Cisco did it'.

I also see no value in it.

On 5 April 2018 at 11:38, Thomas Bellman <bellman at nsc.liu.se> wrote:
> On 2018-04-04 21:09, Niall Donaghy wrote:
>
>> Even more sad to see that 1G ports retain their xe- naming rather than
>> changing to ge- as you would hope and expect.
>
> I have never understood the reason for having different names for
> ports depending on the speed of the transceiver.  To me, it just
> makes things more confusing.
>
> Can someone enlighten me on the benefits of that?
>
>
>         /Bellman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
  ++ytti