[j-nsp] More than 2000 VRFs on MX960
Mike Simkins
mike.simkins at sungardas.com
Fri Jan 12 05:15:13 EST 2018
Yes, on 14.2, and before on 12.3
Slow commit times certainly, and we have an odd issue (which may be our legacy configurations as we seem to have found a work around) where we see the default route 'refresh', which caused some issues on a BGP downstream
Mike Simkins
-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of adamv0025 at netconsultings.com
Sent: 12 January 2018 10:07
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] More than 2000 VRFs on MX960
Hi folks,
Are you using more than 2000 VRFs on MX960 (in production)?
If yes on what code base; and any issues you experienced?
Thanks
adam
netconsultings.com
::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry::
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwICAg&c=gYbc-GKV5BQa9zrq1GFCVg&r=S1PZn0PYDDYtiCW2fix2C1ZHo8KzLAckyehxqI4wl20&m=433XbbH1_ydHlyDUJGmuf0Qd5zTYCtH1TOAz9MgchwM&s=rgPx12nDe4JAbgA2uHom42jlqHVIPI5XzWvLVBJ-QYo&e=
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list