[j-nsp] Experience with MX10003

[Alexandre Guimaraes]

Agreed with Mark.

I have the same discussion with Giuliano about that. 

Expensive line cards against 40/100 mx204 or MX10003.

We are using QFX5110 and QFX5100 at transport layer (P) where (up to)40km is the distance. Keeping MX960 and MX480 delivering services (PE).

The detail about those MXs, and why not put services on them is the reliability/redundancy, as a P only, if they crash, all services still running on PE equipments.

I think that’s the clue about Juniper’s investment and business way....


My cents...

att
Alexandre

Em 26 de jan de 2018, à(s) 03:34, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> escreveu:

> 
> 
>> On 25/Jan/18 20:42, Giuliano C. Medalha wrote:
>> 
>> We are testing the MX10003 right now.
> 
> We're looking at the MX10003 to support customers in the edge who want
> to connect at 40Gbps or 100Gbps. Seems to make more sense to handle
> 1Gbps and 10Gbps links on our MX480, and do the 40Gbps and 100Gbps on
> the MX10003, and avoid having to put expensive MPC's into the MX480 rather.
> 
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp