[j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

[Mark Tinka]

On 2/Jul/18 15:11, Gustavo Santos wrote:

> I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets from
> pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp policer
> police..
> JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable
> default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this issue
> that was solved indeed.
>
> Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended that
> made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical
> ports..)  We had to downgrade to get it back working again..

Since 2008, Juniper have cocked up every opportunity to release a solid
Metro-E box that can compete with the Cisco and Brocade options.

As big as it can be seen to be, the MX204 is probably Juniper's first
real attempt at this.

Mark.