[j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Jul 2 09:18:44 EDT 2018
On 2/Jul/18 15:11, Gustavo Santos wrote:
> I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets from
> pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp policer
> JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable
> default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this issue
> that was solved indeed.
> Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended that
> made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical
> ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again..
Since 2008, Juniper have cocked up every opportunity to release a solid
Metro-E box that can compete with the Cisco and Brocade options.
As big as it can be seen to be, the MX204 is probably Juniper's first
real attempt at this.
More information about the juniper-nsp