[j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

[Pavel Lunin]

Btw, it's a very good question if anyone here has more or less close to
real-world experience with L3 gw and evpn type 5 routes on QFX5110 or maybe
any other trident 2+ based box.

Would much appreciate your input.

Regards,
Pavel

July 3, 2018, 18:48 Roger Wiklund <roger.wiklund at gmail.com>:

> Hi Scott
>
> Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is quite recent.
>
> Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go MX route with
> fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and higher chance to
> overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset limitation.
>
> Regards
> Roger
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Scott Harvanek <scott.harvanek at login.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run into any
> > issues?  I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for these in regards
> > to what they won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like they meet our
> > needs… just curious if anyone has run into any lesser documented issues
> > with them.
> >
> > I’m looking at the list here; https://www.juniper.net/
> >
> documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-constraints-qfx-series.html
> > <https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-
> > constraints-qfx-series.html>
> >
> > Is there a better device for VXLAN on the juniper side? We’re looking for
> > something comparable to the Nexus 9372 on the Cisco side.
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > Scott H
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>