[j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

[Roger Wiklund]

Hi Scott

Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is quite recent.

Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go MX route with
fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and higher chance to
overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset limitation.

Regards
Roger

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Scott Harvanek <scott.harvanek at login.com>
wrote:

> Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run into any
> issues?  I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for these in regards
> to what they won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like they meet our
> needs… just curious if anyone has run into any lesser documented issues
> with them.
>
> I’m looking at the list here; https://www.juniper.net/
> documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-constraints-qfx-series.html
> <https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-
> constraints-qfx-series.html>
>
> Is there a better device for VXLAN on the juniper side? We’re looking for
> something comparable to the Nexus 9372 on the Cisco side.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Scott H
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>