[j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

[Gustavo Santos]

Yes... Exactly.

I upgraded to 17.3R2 and was a total mess. And had to downgrade to 15.1X
train.


On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:31 AM Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:

> Gustavo,
>
> We you say " Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC
> recommended that made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find
> the physical ports..)  We had to downgrade to get it back working again.."
> what version was this as JTAC recently changed their recommended version?
> It seem everyone on this thread is talking about software train  15.1X54.
>
> However, the current JTAC recommended version is Junos 17.3R2 as of 14 May
> 2018. Why is everyone running  15.1X54 code?
>
> Has anyone upgraded to  Junos 17.3R2 on the ACX's? No matter the model,
> all ACX's current recommended is now  Junos 17.3R2
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Gustavo Santos <gustkiller at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets from
>> pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp policer
>> police..
>> JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable
>> default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this issue
>> that was solved indeed.
>>
>> Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended that
>> made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical
>> ports..)  We had to downgrade to get it back working again..
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM Alexandre Guimaraes <
>> alexandre.guimaraes at ascenty.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in
>>> qfx5100
>>>
>>> Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately, with all
>>> problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the last
>>> breath of cpu.... after that, all deamons and services going down.... up
>>> and down, up and down.
>>>
>>> I never more brought one peace ACX5048 after jtac didnt responds why and
>>> solution for the leaking...( I have only two acx5048 and hundreds on
>>> QFX...).
>>>
>>> The new promise is the new acx5448. No vlan leaking, a good load
>>> balance(ae) algorithm, full of this.... full of that.... a lot of promise.
>>>
>>> Let’s see...
>>>
>>> att
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>> Em 1 de jul de 2018, à(s) 19:31, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>> > What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise they
>>> > look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the
>>> > ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related?
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
>>
>