[j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

[Colton Conor]

Strange we had no issues upgrading from  17.3R2 from  15.1X.

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Gustavo Santos <gustkiller at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes... Exactly.
>
> I upgraded to 17.3R2 and was a total mess. And had to downgrade to 15.1X
> train.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:31 AM Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Gustavo,
>>
>> We you say " Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC
>> recommended that made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find
>> the physical ports..)  We had to downgrade to get it back working again.."
>> what version was this as JTAC recently changed their recommended version?
>> It seem everyone on this thread is talking about software train  15.1X54.
>>
>> However, the current JTAC recommended version is Junos 17.3R2 as of 14
>> May 2018. Why is everyone running  15.1X54 code?
>>
>> Has anyone upgraded to  Junos 17.3R2 on the ACX's? No matter the model,
>> all ACX's current recommended is now  Junos 17.3R2
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Gustavo Santos <gustkiller at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets from
>>> pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp policer
>>> police..
>>> JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable
>>> default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this issue
>>> that was solved indeed.
>>>
>>> Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended that
>>> made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical
>>> ports..)  We had to downgrade to get it back working again..
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM Alexandre Guimaraes <
>>> alexandre.guimaraes at ascenty.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in
>>>> qfx5100
>>>>
>>>> Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately, with
>>>> all problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the
>>>> last breath of cpu.... after that, all deamons and services going down....
>>>> up and down, up and down.
>>>>
>>>> I never more brought one peace ACX5048 after jtac didnt responds why
>>>> and solution for the leaking...( I have only two acx5048 and hundreds on
>>>> QFX...).
>>>>
>>>> The new promise is the new acx5448. No vlan leaking, a good load
>>>> balance(ae) algorithm, full of this.... full of that.... a lot of promise.
>>>>
>>>> Let’s see...
>>>>
>>>> att
>>>> Alexandre
>>>>
>>>> Em 1 de jul de 2018, à(s) 19:31, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com>
>>>> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> > What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise
>>>> they
>>>> > look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the
>>>> > ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related?
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>>
>>>
>>