[j-nsp] 6PE without family inet6 labeled-unicast

[Andrey Kostin]

Hi Aaron,

Possibly it could, but it definitely needs to be checked and tested 
about possibility of unequal load-balancing. As far as next-hop tooling 
required anyway to process those prefixes in a different way than other 
announced from PEs, and traffic is actually sent via rsvp tunnels, 
probably the outcome will be just replacing one kind of complexity with 
another. It will be interesting to test though.

BTW, thanks to all who replied! Looks like one of my previous messages 
didn't reach the list.

Kind regards
Andrey

Aaron Gould писал 30.07.2018 13:37:
> ".... so for traffic load-balancing we change next-hop to anycast 
> loopback
> address shared by those two PE and use dedicated LSPs to that IP with
> "no-install" for real PE loopback addresses"
>
> Did you have to use this anycast method?... just wondering if bgp
> multipathing would've worked in this case also...and if so, why was 
> one
> method chose over the other
>
> -Aaron