[j-nsp] Router for full routes

Tom Beecher beecher at beecher.cc
Wed Jun 27 10:42:53 EDT 2018

Can confirm convergence time on the MX80 with even a single full table
session is extremely painful, and essentially not functional in a
production environment.

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Dovid Bender <dovid at telecurve.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> In my 9-5 I work for an ITSP where we have two MX5's with
> - iBGP
> - two up steams with two BGP sessions each (one per routes)
> - one upstream with one bgp session
> - one bgp session where we get minimal routes (maybe 15 total)
> I was told that convergence time on the MX5 would be horrible so we never
> tried full routes. I am wondering what's the "lowest" model that can
> support full routes without having an issue re-sorting the routes.
> TIA.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list