[j-nsp] MX204

[Eric Krichbaum]

I tried the knobs in the kb as well with no luck.  Never got the 40G port to detect as 40.  Just split 10s.  trying to 40 on 2 ports to a QFX virt chassis.

Eric


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Nathan Ward
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 4:53 PM
To: Bill Blackford <bblackford at gmail.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX204

Hi,

Single RE - but it’s fast, much much faster than the MX80/MX104

You can’t use all ports at once - if you want to use the 10G ports, you need to sacrifice one of the 100G ports - to stop oversubscription. I got the impression there was a knob to allow it but I couldn’t make it work, and, didn’t need it :)

My understanding is BNG isn’t supported etc. at the moment.

I guess with no MIC hole, you can’t put an MS-MIC in there for CGN/whatever, if you care about that.

Otherwise seems like a pretty good box for a bunch of scenarios, at what seems like quite a reasonable price.

It’s just above the level where it’s too fast for software routers, so, can imagine in.. maybe 2-3 years, the new release same performance box is virtualised.

> On 14/05/2018, at 7:41 PM, Bill Blackford <bblackford at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Anyone using MX204?
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Benefits / Drawbacks?
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> B
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus