eric at telic.us
Mon May 14 17:58:20 EDT 2018
I tried the knobs in the kb as well with no luck. Never got the 40G port to detect as 40. Just split 10s. trying to 40 on 2 ports to a QFX virt chassis.
From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Nathan Ward
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 4:53 PM
To: Bill Blackford <bblackford at gmail.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX204
Single RE - but it’s fast, much much faster than the MX80/MX104
You can’t use all ports at once - if you want to use the 10G ports, you need to sacrifice one of the 100G ports - to stop oversubscription. I got the impression there was a knob to allow it but I couldn’t make it work, and, didn’t need it :)
My understanding is BNG isn’t supported etc. at the moment.
I guess with no MIC hole, you can’t put an MS-MIC in there for CGN/whatever, if you care about that.
Otherwise seems like a pretty good box for a bunch of scenarios, at what seems like quite a reasonable price.
It’s just above the level where it’s too fast for software routers, so, can imagine in.. maybe 2-3 years, the new release same performance box is virtualised.
> On 14/05/2018, at 7:41 PM, Bill Blackford <bblackford at gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone using MX204?
> Benefits / Drawbacks?
> Thank you in advance.
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
More information about the juniper-nsp