[j-nsp] Use cases for IntServ in MPLS backbones
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Oct 2 06:55:37 EDT 2018
On 2/Oct/18 12:47, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I think this is wrong thing to focus on. Should we focus on 'will it
> work now universally' or should we focus on 'should we strive it to
> work'.
>
> I feel like you're saying 'because it does not work universally, we
> shouldn't try to ensure it works'. Which is peculiar statement to
> make.
>
> Now I could understand 'it should not work, it's bad if it works' , I
> don't agree, but at least it's logical.
If you are up to starting a movement that fixes this issue globally so
that, as network operators, we all agree that we should make it work,
I'm all for it.
But I'm also realistic - despite a properly-defined RFC1918 spec. that
suggest what IP addresses to use in your private network, you still see
a bunch of people using 1.0.0.0/24 for the private LAN.
Correcting stuff like this is hard, Saku. Believe me, I've tried. But if
you have a better way to approach this, I'm all ears.
Mark.
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list