[j-nsp] QFX5110 : Q-in-Q in VXLAN

[Olivier FRUQUET]

Hello,
Thank you for your answers, very bad news for me :(
There's no solution to make a transparent pseudowire with support of VLAN
tags with my hardware ?

Olivier

Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 21:32, Raphael Mazelier <raph at futomaki.net> a
écrit :

> On 10/09/2018 21:22, Raphael Maunier wrote:
> >
> > There is some limitation on the qfx due to the Broadcom chip. On the
> 10k, you don’t have all the limitations to the cheap chip ^^
> >
> > On the 5100 you have a lot of limitation on the 5110, you have less, but
> not sure it support the double tag encapsulated frames (Broadcom)
> >
> > I have a bunch of evpn infrastructure deployed, but I never tried to use
> q-in-q, so not sure if 5k will support this.
> > I have 10k’s in the lab I may be able to test it
> >
>
> Got the same problem type of problem on EX5440 and QFX5100.
> There are (very) slow limit on label stacking due to the chip.
>
> Quoting the doc (Read
>
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/general/mpls-limitations-qfx-series.html)
>
> :
>
> - Push of a maximum of three labels is supported in the MPLS edge switch
> if label swap is not done.
>
> - Push of a maximum of two labels is supported in the MPLS edge switch
> if label swap is done.
>
>
> --
> Raphael Mazelier
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>