[j-nsp] Any red flags on this MX240 configuration...

[Benjamin Collet]

Hi Alain,

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:46:42AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
>     Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL.  My experience with 16.2 was
> pretty solid.
> 
>     We're planning to have 3 Full Routes BGP and the MPLS alphabet soup,
> yadi yada.
> 
>     We don't want 2 RE since we'll use 2 MX240 and there is no point to go
> for ISSU since the RE is EOL.
> 
>    1x CHAS-BP-MX240-S
>    1x FFANTRAY-MX240-HC
>    1x RE-S-2000-4096-S
>    1x SCBE-MX-S
>    2x PWR-MX480-1200-AC
>    1x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP


I am not sure the MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP can work with a SCBE-MX-S, it seems
you need at least a SCBE2 (same goes if you plan to insert a MPC7):

  https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/enhanced-mx-scb-description-mx960.html

Cheers,
Ben
-- 
Benjamin Collet